Risk tolerance is one of the main components of the financial risk assessment process. And yet, despite the importance of this part of the process, the questionnaires built and produced to track the amount of risk tolerance that a client can bear are highly inefficient.
This has led to inefficiency in the entire financial advisory and has also led to issues with the performances of financial advisors and their firms. But what makes financial risk tolerance questionnaires so inefficient? What are the issues that plague risk tolerance assessment questionnaires? Keep reading this blog to find out:
Inefficiencies In Financial Risk Assessment Tool
1. Confusion Regarding The Exact Definition Of Risk Tolerance
What is risk tolerance? How does one define it? Of all the risk profiling and assessment tools in the financial industry, there are but a few questionnaires that go in-depth regarding this kind of problem. And when it comes to defining risk tolerance, there aren’t many questionnaires that do it. Not every person is fully aware of the concept of risk tolerance. That can lead to confusion from the client’s side when filling out a questionnaire.
2. Dancing Around The Point
The purpose of using a Financial Risk Assessment Tool is to understand the kind of risk that the client is willing to take. But it also has another use. With a questionnaire like that, the financial advisory firm can also make the client aware of the volatility of financial decisions such as investing in stocks or bonds.
That is where questionnaires falter. They dance around the point. They get a vague idea of the kind of decision making that the client possesses but don’t get a clear image of the kind of tolerance that the client is willing to bear in the face of the financial instability in the market.
3. Measuring Risk Tolerance For The Sake Of It
To reiterate, the point of a Risk Attitude Assessment Tool is to gauge the exact amount of risk tolerance that the client can bear. But many questionnaires are designed to measure a vague image of the client’s actual risk tolerance limit just for the sake of showing that the financial advisory firm conducted a risk tolerance survey.
4. Ignoring The Difference Between Risk Tolerance & Risk Capacity
One of the most significant issues that such questionnaires encounter is the difference between the two concepts. There is a big difference between risk tolerance and risk capacity surveys.
To keep it short, risk tolerance is a subjective concept that gauges a client’s mental and psychometric view regarding their finances and how much they are willing to risk, despite the pitfalls of financial instability.
In contrast, risk capacity is an objective concept. Risk capacity means the maximum amount that a client can risk regarding financial investments. They can’t afford to risk any more than that.
Some questionnaires either don’t differentiate between the two or don’t make it clear to the one filling it what the difference is between them.
5. Response Bias Due To External Factors
Taking into account response bias can be difficult, admittedly, but it needs to be considered. When a client is filling out a form, their mental and financial state at that moment matters significantly. They might be in a circumstance where, in their mind, they might be financially insecure and not willing to risk a significant amount, or it might be the other way around. This response bias can influence things in a substantial way.
In Conclusion
These are just five ways a Risk capacity evaluation questionnaire can be inefficient.
Eliminate these pitfalls with the Pocket Risk Risk appetite questionnaire and investor profile questionnaire online that any financial advisory firm can use to gauge the financial and investment profiles of the clients that are coming to them. You can check out a demo of our services today on our website!